Virginia Legislature Should Be Charged With Murder

4/17/07 - 3rd Day - Before Lunch. Virginia Legislature Should Be Charged With Murder

I see where more and more idiots (as is expected) are using this Virginia Tech shooting as a platform to call for more gun restrictions. This despite the fact that the shooting happened in an area where guns are banned (on campus). Although it is legal in Virginia to carry a concealed handgun, the policy of Virginia Tech made it against the rules for VT students to protect themselves. The result? 32 unarmed dead people. The fact that this is being called the biggest mass killing in US history, is both WRONG and very telling.

Prior to this incident, the largest SCHOOL shooting in history happened at the University of Texas in 1966. In that case, Charles Whitman, a very highly trained Marine sniper, killed 15 people from the 27 story tower on the campus, before he was killed by authorities. But let us look at the specifics...

A COMPARISON BETWEEN TEXAS 1966 and VIRGINIA 2007

Whitman was a highly trained shooter, carried more weaponry and ammo, fired from a superior position on an elevated platform where he had 360 degree access to the full bustling campus full of pedestrians, a highly trafficked commercial area, and the ability to hit hard targets who thought they were hidden. Cho (the VT shooter) was lightly trained, if at all, had a few handguns and limited ammo, had to operate in an environment where students were able to barricade themselves from him, and where, quite often, bullets did not penetrate the barricades. Whitman had a sawed off shotgun, a Remington 700 rifle with a scope, another .35 caliber Remington rifle, an M1 carbine, a 357 magnum, a Galesi-Brescia pistol, and a Luger pistol. Cho apparently had a couple of 9mm pistols.

So why the disparity in the death toll? Whitman was a highly trained marine with remarkable sniping skills, more firepower, a better shooting platform, and in a time and place of looser gun laws. Whitman was able to hit many of his targets from upwards of 500 yards, and incredibly made two "impossible" hits at over 1000 yards. Why didn't he kill more than Cho?

BECAUSE PEOPLE WERE FIRING BACK!

Whitman had a minute or so of free fire before he started receiving return fire from pedestrians, shop owners, police and students. When Whitman was killed, he was pinned down, forced to shoot through a rain spout and unable to move for a better place to fire. In Texas in 1966, people owned, carried, and knew how to shoot guns - and they were not afraid to use them to stop an evil-doer. In Virginia in 2007, Cho had a target rich environment of unarmed pacifists, who dutifully were lined up and executed without fighting back.

Apparently, last year a bill was brought up in the Virginia assembly which would have allowed licensed concealed carry on campus, but it was defeated.

The Virginia Legislature should be charged with 32 counts of murder.

Oh, and this wasn't the largest mass murder in US history. There have been many more deadly encounters... specifically the government sanctioned murder of over 80 people in their church in Waco, Texas.

Here is another thing to think about.

This shooting is the product of a Godless society that worships children. In 1966 MOST people did not go to college. College was a place for specific advanced education, not a place where EVERY high school graduate goes to stay immature for another 4 years on Daddy's dime. In 2007 the colleges are stock full of moron's who can't even speak properly, who are spoiled rotten, and who are NOT qualified for higher education. Attending college in 2007 is like attending high school in 1966... almost everyone does it, and is expected to. But the college student of 2007 is FAR more immature, ignorant, socially inept, and emotionally driven than the high school student in 1966. College is about "diversity", and being brainwashed in Industrial myths, historical lies, and social expectations. In 1966, the college students at UT could write in complete sentences, and did not think that the word "like" had to be interspersed in every sentence, every few words. In 1966, a student with a gun was likely to be a valuable person in society, who knew how to use the weapon to defend life, liberty and property. Charles Whitman was a troubled man who happened to have a brain tumor that was pressing on his hypothalamus region of his brain. This tumor likely caused him to be mentally unbalanced, resulting in actions he himself could not explain. This character 'Cho', brainwashed in a culture awash in soap-opera sentimentality, and rampant emotionalism - snapped because his girlfriend broke up with him. He learned it on TV, and in college, and from his generation and culture. Cho loved himself so much, because he was taught to do so by the same types of educators who now reject him. He is the product of their wisdom, and their carnal culture. He is the product of the society they have been trying to build for a century, and he is exactly what this "self-esteem" society will continue to produce.

I heard where the Bushite moron head of Australia claimed that this shooting was the product of the American "gun culture". Readily available guns did not result in this mass shooting. The largest shootings in history have happened in places where guns were banned... in Russia (over 300) and in Tasmania, AUSTRALIA (over 35). The Australians banned guns, and were able to top the body count in Virginia Tech, so the leader of Australia ought to shut his trap and maybe re-arm his citizenry. These massacres happen where people are disarmed, and that is a FACT.

I am your servant in Christ Jesus,

Michael Bunker
http://biblicalagrarianism.com
http://lazarusunbound.com
editor@lazarusunbound.com